Niagara Gazette

Opinion

March 9, 2014

SINGER: Living in a world of nukes

Niagara Gazette — Few around here need to be reminded of the Manhattan Project’s environmental impact, and one sometimes wishes that Enrico Fermi, Niels Bohr et al. hadn’t done research that eventually helped create a new, Dr. Strangelove weapon and world.

That came home quite recently with the chilling report of a near nuclear explosion in North Carolina of the early ‘60s that would have changed the U.S. and Western civilization forever. It’s also made people look behind anodyne headlines on Pakistan’s or North Korea’s nuclear programs, which have fewer safeguards than over here, not to mention Iran’s possible acquisition of nukes, which their current “moderates” are still trying to finesse.

Somehow, there seems less talk lately of “dirty bombs” being acquired by terrorists who care nothing about anyone (witness the shoot-up of civilians in a Nairobi mall, among so much else). But the threat remains significant, and yes, the world would probably have been better off without all that scientific experimentation that led to this Sword of Damocles over our collective heads.

One caveat’s in order, and that concerns the so-called Greatest Generation that paid with so much blood in the Pacific theater to finally turn back the Japanese in World War II. When it comes to the Hiroshima-Nagasaki tragedy, there has been protracted debate — should President Truman have issued a warning, perhaps detonating on an uninhabited island to show his new weapon’s force? Should he have used only one bomb over Hiroshima and put the screws to Emperor Hirohito, who already wanted peace, before having a second dropped over Nagasaki?

But Hirohito couldn’t control his suicidal, honor-bound military, and then comes the big debate within a debate: how many American lives would have been lost by a conventional invasion of Japan, and how many Japanese? Winston Churchill estimated astronomical numbers there, far greater than those ensuing from the nuclear tragedy, and so did others, except, that is, for “revisionist” scholars of the late ‘60s, emboldened by peace and hippy movements of their time. Such analysts severely reduced these potential human losses, but really, without anything more than war game-type supposition, rather than hard facts.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion
Featured Ads
House Ads
AP Video
Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Amphibious Landing Practice in Hawaii Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page