Niagara Gazette

Local News

September 6, 2013

Mailer delivers anxiety for Hamister project

(Continued)

Niagara Gazette —

USA Niagara is the lead agency on the procurement process known as a request for proposals on the 310 Rainbow Blvd. parcel.

Representatives from the Hamister Group, USA Niagara and Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s office did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

The development deal has become politically charged in recent months with a trio of city council members – Council Chairman Glenn Choolokian, Councilman Sam Fruscione and Councilman Robert Anderson Jr. – calling into question the terms of  the proposed development agreement that has been in the works since February when Hamister Group was selected as the preferred developer for the parcel.

Those council members voted to table a resolution to approve the agreement between the developer, the state and the city at the July 8 council meeting. It has remained tabled since.

The city received the land — a parking lot with a small building that currently houses a restaurant —  as part of a gift that included the former Rainbow Centre mall building from Baltimore developer David Cordish in 2009.

The proposed agreement would see the land sold to Hamister Group for $100,000 and the company receive a $2.75 million state grant in exchange for a promise to complete the $25.3 million mixed-use building which would include a hotel, residential space and retail space.

The lawmakers calling the deal into question have said that the sale price for the prime piece of real estate is too low and that Dyster is afforded too much power in the proposed deal.

Corporation Counsel Craig Johnson has been working with USA Niagara and the developer in an effort to address the concerns of the council members.

Schoepflin has acknowledged that the price of the land is below market value by design, and has said it is part of an incentive package that will leverage tens of millions of dollars in private investment.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Broncos Owner Steps Down Due to Alzheimer's US, UN Push Shuttle Diplomacy in Mideast Trump: DC Hotel Will Be Among World's Best Plane Crashes in Taiwan, Dozens Feared Dead Republicans Hold a Hearing on IRS Lost Emails Raw: Mourners Gather As MH17 Bodies Transported Robot Parking Valet Creates Stress-free Travel Raw: MH17 Bodies Arrive in Netherlands Raw: Fight Breaks Out in Ukraine Parliament Disabled Veterans Memorial Nearing Completion Last Mass Lynching in U.S. Remains Unsolved Home-sharing Programs Help Seniors Ex-NYC Mayor: US Should Allow Flights to Israel Clinton: "AIDS-Free Generation Within Our Reach" Judge Ponders Overturning Colo. Gay Marriage Ban Airlines Halt Travel to Israel Amid Violence Police Probing Brooklyn Bridge Flag Switch
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results