Niagara Gazette

Local News

September 3, 2013

Sign law slowly taking shape in Village of Lewiston

Niagara Gazette — LEWISTON — Progress has been slow completing a new sign law in the Village of Lewiston, the author said Tuesday.

Kenneth Slagenhoupt, village planning board chairman, said he's no closer to completing revised legislation designed to better enforce signage restrictions throughout the area following an August public hearing.

"I'm thinking this isn't going to be resolved in the next 30 days," he said during the village board's work session.

Slagenhoupt originally crafted a law to replace the current version on the books and presented it to the village board Aug. 19, in which he explained new regulations restricting LED displays and practically eliminating A-frame "sandwich board" signs from village use.

The LED signs, which are brightly-lit video boards capable of animated graphics, would be illegal in historic properties throughout the village, though it is likely to expand to cover entire historic districts before it's adopted.

Opinions expressed at the public hearing, expressing a concern about eliminating A-frame signs, prompted the board to refer the matter back to the chairman for further review. Residents and business owners speaking at the meeting said they'd support "sandwich board" signs for a limited time but didn't care for an outright ban, despite board members calling them hazards sitting in the pedestrian right-of-way.

Slagenhoupt decided to change his proposed law drastically concerning the "sandwich boards," which he's proposing to allow in the village during a set time and a set sign fee. He initially said June 15 through Sept. 15 would be the allotted time and would require a specified sticker licensing the board for use.

"This way, if the enforcement officer walks by and sees the sign is out of date, he picks it up and takes it to someplace the owner would have to interact with the village to retrieve," he said.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Disabled Veterans Memorial Nearing Completion Last Mass Lynching in U.S. Remains Unsolved Home-sharing Programs Help Seniors Clinton: "AIDS-Free Generation Within Our Reach" Ex-NYC Mayor: US Should Allow Flights to Israel Judge Ponders Overturning Colo. Gay Marriage Ban Airlines Halt Travel to Israel Amid Violence NYPD Chief Calls for 'use of Force' Retraining VA Nominee McDonald Goes Before Congress Bush: Don't Worry, Sugarland Isn't Breaking Up US Official: Most Migrant Children to Be Removed Police Probing Brooklyn Bridge Flag Switch CDC Head Concerned About a Post-antibiotic Era Raw: First Lady Says `Drink Up' More Water Courts Conflicted Over Healthcare Law Holder Urges Bipartisanship on Immigration Raw: Truck, Train Crash Leads to Fireball US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results