Niagara Gazette

Local News

January 21, 2013

Turtle building assessment may be lowered, Falls would owe NFR $37K

Niagara Gazette — The city’s law department is recommending that the city council pass a resolution that will give it the authority to execute a settlement with Niagara Falls Redevelopment that would see the long-vacant turtle building reassessed at a value $600,000 less than it is now by the city assessor’s office.

The settlement would see the taxable value of the building fall from $1.5 million to $900,000 and would require the city to repay the company the difference in the tax rates from 2011 and 2012.

Corporation Counsel Craig Johnson said that the settlement was “in the city’s best interest,” but declined to elaborate. 

He then referred a Gazette reporter to First Deputy Corporation Counsel Thomas O’Donnell, who Johnson said was handling the case.

O’Donnell did not return calls seeking comment Friday afternoon.

The company sued the city in New York State Supreme Court and will pay almost $19,000 less in taxes this year and will be repaid over $37,000 for the last two tax years if the city settles.

Roger Trevino, the company’s executive vice president, did not return calls seeking comment on Friday.

City Council Chairman Glenn Choolokian said he hadn’t had time to review the settlement closely when reached by phone on Friday afternoon, but that he had some questions for the law department.

“We want to make sure this is a good deal for the city,” he said.

Choolokian said if the law department says that the case will be costly to litigate and the city is not in a good position to win, the settlement may be the best route to take.

“We could end up losing money,” he explained. “Why waste all that time if it’s going to end up costing us more?”

Mayor Paul Dyster said that he trusts the law department’s judgement.

“Obviously a lot of factors go into settling on a number,” he said.

Dyster said the city council may go into executive session at Tuesday’s meeting where they will be given the information they need to make a good decision.

“Ultimately it’s up to council to decide what they want to do,” the mayor said.

 

 

Glenn Choolokian Looking at deal

 

1
Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
SKorea Ferry Toll Hits 156, Search Gets Tougher Video Shows Possible Syrian Gas Attack Cubs Superfans Celebrate Wrigley's 100th Raw: Cattle Truck Overturns in Texas Admirers Flock to Dole During Kansas Homecoming Raw: Erupting Volcanoes in Guatemala and Peru Alibaba IPO Could Be Largest Ever for Tech Firm FBI Joining Probe of Suburban NY 'Swatting' Call U.S. Paratroopers in Poland, Amid Ukraine Crisis US Reviews Clemency for Certain Inmates Raw: Violence Erupts in Rio Near Olympic Venue Raw: Deadly Bombing in Egypt Raw: What's Inside a Commercial Jet Wheel Well Raw: Obama Arrives in Japan for State Visit Raw: Anti-Obama Activists Fight Manila Police Motels Near Disney Fighting Homeless Problem Michigan Man Sees Thanks to 'bionic Eye' S.C. Man Apologizes for Naked Walk in Wal-Mart Chief Mate: Crew Told to Escape After Passengers
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results