Niagara Gazette

Local News

May 22, 2013

Lew-Port budget voted down by voters

Niagara Gazette — LEWISTON — A bid to pass a school budget in excess of the state-imposed tax cap failed to win support from voters in the Lewiston-Porter School District on Tuesday.

On a day when polls were busy well into the evening, the proposed 2013-14 spending plan was defeated in a 1,105-912 vote, far below the 60 percent support needed to adopt the budget in excess of the property tax cap. 

In what district Superintendent R. Christopher Roser described as the night’s “silver lining,” voters did approve a $26 million capital improvement project that will allow for upgrades to Lewiston-Porter High School and four other district buildings.

School officials used words like “stunned” and “disappointed” after the budget vote totals were announced.

“We’re going to see the quality of education decline,” Roser said. “It’s that simple.” 

The proposed $40 million spending plan called for a 5.5 percent tax levy increase. The figures exceeded New York’s tax cap, requiring it to be approved by a so-called “supermajority” of 60 percent of the district’s voters. 

The school board is expected to meet next Tuesday to discuss possible alternatives, including a potential follow-up vote on a revised spending plan proposal in June. 

At this point, Roser said the budget’s failure will result in the loss of eight teacher aide positions, the elimination of after-school support programs for students, an end to the modified sports program, the implementation of a half-day pre-kindergarten and other changes. 

In his opinion, Roser said it all adds up to one thing: fewer valuable services and recreational activities for district students.

“Education in Lew-Port is going to change,” he said. “It may be subtle this year, but it’s going to change. We’re going to have to do some pretty creative things.”

Teachers’ union president Kevin Jaruszewski agreed with Roser’s assessment and said he believes all the talk about the district attempting to exceed the state’s tax cap in the weeks leading up to the vote had an impact on the final outcome. He suggested the tax cap override detracted from the core elements of the spending plan, which represented a slight decrease in overall district spending. 

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Raw: Fire Engulfs Tower Block in China Ocean Drones Making Waves in Research World Breakfast Foods Are Getting Pricier Raw: Ferry Captain Received Medical Treatment Hundreds Gather for Denver Pot Rally on Easter Transcript Reveals Confusion in Ferry Evacuation Raw: More Than 100,000 Gather for Easter Sunday Raw: Greeks Celebrate Easter With "Rocket War" Police Question Captain, Crew on Ferry Disaster Raw: Orthodox Christians Observe Easter Rite Raw: Four French Journalists Freed From Syria
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results