Niagara Gazette

Local News

May 20, 2013

Lew-Port looks to override tax cap

Niagara Gazette — Tuesday’s budget vote in Lewiston-Porter will affect more than $66 million in spending over the course of the next few years.

Getting approval to actually touch that money is likely to be the toughest challenge the district has ever faced, considering the status of the school’s finances.

With millions of state dollars disappearing every year since 2009, Lew-Port’s school board decided to attempt an override of the state’s property tax cap law to help balance a 2013-14 budget. In proposing a 5.5 percent levy increase, they’ve determined funding offerings like its afterschool assistance program for struggling high school students and modified sports for middle schoolers unready to face junior varsity-level competition more important than worrying about the financial struggles of an aging electorate.

Now they need more than 60 percent support from the public to approve the plan, a statistical improbability considering both the district’s history at the polls and the failure rate of last year’s override attempts across New York.

Historically, the district has not attempted such drastic increases to its levy in the past five years. But in a study of election results since 1980, only one proposal of more than 5 percent increase achieved more than the required 60 percent yes votes. Though no tax cap existed prior to 2012’s election, several proposed budgets in the same 30-plus year time frame were either approved by less than 60 percent or failed at the polls.

Last year’s results also point out a grim prospect for Lew-Port. Nineteen — including neighbor Niagara-Wheatfield — districts failed to pass a budget on the first vote last year because of attempts to override the state law. Many of them succeeded in passing a reduced tax levy plan in a second vote last June, but districts relying on extra support from voters found it missing when it mattered.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results