Niagara Gazette

Local News

January 23, 2014

Lewiston officials decline release of details in officers' conduct case.

Niagara Gazette — TOWN OF LEWISTON — Town officials still aren’t discussing the conduct of a pair of police officers who were the subject of an internal investigation last year.

Under a state statute dating back to the 1970s, they are under no legal obligation to do so. 

Civil Rights Law section 50-a requires “all personnel records, used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion” for first responders to be “considered confidential and not subject to inspection or review without the express written consent of such police officer, firefighter/paramedic, correction officer or peace officer within the division of parole except as may be mandated by lawful court order.”

In recent weeks, Town Attorney Mark Davis and members of the town board have repeatedly cited the statue while declining comment on the specific nature of last year’s investigation, which they have acknowledged involved the Niagara County District Attorney’s Office and the New York State Police. 

“It’s a state statute that I’m not allowed to comment on this matter,” Councilman Michael Marra said last week. 

Town officials confirmed in October that two members of the town’s police force were investigated for unspecified “allegations.” They have declined comment on the specific nature of the “allegations,” although they are believed to have been tied to the officers’ access to the town’s fuel supply station on Swann Road. 

“I don’t think we ever ran from that,” Councilman Ernest Palmer said last week. “But it never went through the criminal justice system. So all we can really say is there were some allegations.”

The investigation followed the installation of surveillance equipment near the town fuel pumps last year. The source of the equipment, which has since been removed, is also not being discussed publicly by town officials.

In a 2011 audit, the New York State Comptroller’s Office questioned the internal controls over the town’s fuel supply. At the time, state auditors indicated that they found “no evidence of criminal activity” during their review of the town’s operations and finances.  

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case Author Gabriel Garcia Marquez Dead at 87 Beau Biden Plans 2016 Run for Del. Governor Chelsea Clinton Is Pregnant Horseless Carriage Introduced at NY Auto Show Obama Hopeful on Ukraine, Will Watch Russians Flamingo Frenzy Ahead of Zoo Construction Crew Criticized Over Handling of Ferry Disaster Agreement Reached to Calm Ukraine Tensions Raw: Pope Francis Performs Pre-easter Ritual Boston Bombing Survivors One Year Later Sister of Slain MIT Officer Reflects on Bombing
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results