Niagara Gazette

Local News

November 18, 2013

Attorneys debate diagnosis in nursing home beating case

Niagara Gazette — BUFFALO — A defense attorney for Chester Rusek, the 88-year-old man accused of brutally beating his nursing home roommate, argued Monday that his client's recent dementia diagnosis should be entered as evidence in the manslaughter trial.

"This not only impaired his judgment but prohibited him from checking or inhibiting his behavioral actions," attorney Barry Dolgoff said.

Rusek, who was brought into court in a wheelchair Monday, is charged with attacking Salvatore Trusello, 86, on the morning of Nov. 26, 2012, at the Kenwell De-Paul Senior Living Community. A month later, Trusello died, and Rusek's first-degree assault was upgraded to first-degree manslaughter.

In September, Erie County Court doctors evaluated Rusek and declared him to be competent. At Dolgoff's request, the defendant was subsequently evaluated by his own doctor, who agreed with the first findings. As a result, Dolgoff dropped his challenge concerning Rusek's ability to stand trial.

But the doctor diagnosed Rusek with frontotemporal dementia, which is characterized by a shrinking of brain lobes and is associated with symptoms such as inappropriate actions, lack of judgment and empathy, compulsiveness and behavioral changes.

Prosecutor Paul Bonanno objected to the admissibility of the evidence, and said defense attorneys are required to submit their intent to present such information within 30 days of the arraignment.

"It should speak to the mental state at the time of the incident," he said. "Now it's a year after the crime."

Dolgoff argued that Rusek's state is likely not substantially different now.

Bonanno also said that the physician's report does not clearly state how the psychiatric issue affected Rusek on the day of the alleged crime. Penal law specifies that the diagnosis must lead the defendant to not appreciate his actions or appreciate what he did wrong, he said.

Bonanno asked to submit his objections in writing. The two attorneys will then be back in court Nov. 27 to argue the matter in more detail. 

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Raw: Families Travel to Taiwan Plane Crash Site Arizona Execution Takes Almost Two Hours Gen. Odierno Discusses Ukraine, NATO at Forum Gaza Fighting Rages Amid Cease-Fire Efforts Mint Gives JFK Coin a Face-lift Creative Makeovers for Ugly Cellphone Towers Ariz. Inmate Dies 2 Hours After Execution Began Crash Kills Teen Pilot Seeking World Record LeBron James Sends Apology Treat to Neighbors Raw: Funeral for Man Who Died in NYPD Custody Migrants Back in Honduras After US Deports Israeli American Reservist Torn Over Return Raw: ISS Cargo Ship Launches in Kazakhstan Six Indicted in StubHub Hacking Scheme Former NTSB Official: FAA Ban 'prudent' EPA Gets Hip With Kardashian Tweet Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in the Netherlands Biden Decries Voting Restrictions in NAACP Talk Broncos Owner Steps Down Due to Alzheimer's US, UN Push Shuttle Diplomacy in Mideast
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results