Niagara Gazette

Local News

November 28, 2012

County weighing options on voting machine storage

Niagara Gazette — A legislative committee is considering whether to put the county's voting machine storage space contract out to bid. Earlier this week, the committee declined to recommend a resolution authorizing extension of the county's current contract with Clear Opportunity Properties LLC, which charges $86,400 a year to store voting machines at 1961 Transit Road, Burt. It's the same building where the Legislature last month OK'd a five-year lease for controlled-environment storage space for county records. That lease deal, struck with Clear Opportunity Properties' owner David Ulrich of Lockport, is worth about $125,000 a year. Approval of the records storage lease was on a split vote. Democratic legislators opposed it in part because the county clerk's office had only worked with Ulrich to develop controlled-environment space; officials did not consult with other property owners or developers, or put up a request for proposals for controlled storage, to see if any better deals were possible. On County Attorney Claude Joerg's determination that leased space is not a good or a service that's subject to competitive procurement requirements, the Republican-led majority caucus shot down Minority Caucus Leader Dennis Virtuoso's proposal to put aside the lease agreement and do an RFP. The resolution to extend the county's contract with Ulrich for the voting machine storage space came before the admin committee in mid-November. After Virtuoso chimed in about the lack of a search for best offers on this one too, admin chairman Keith McNall, R-Lockport, got a vote to table the resolution — and told Virtuoso he'd look into it. Quietly this week, when administration reconvened, McNall solicited members' motions to un-table the extension resolution and put it up to a vote. The latter motion fetched no yeses, meaning the committee would not refer the resolution to the full Legislature. Admin's failure to recommend contract extension means "we're going to take a second look ... at some sort of competitive marketing process" to acquire voting-machine storage space by leasing, McNall said Wednesday. "Maybe we will do an RFP; I'm still looking into the proper way" to shop around for space.

1
Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Amphibious Landing Practice in Hawaii Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results