Niagara Gazette

Local News

July 11, 2013

Judge names referee to oversee effort to reopen Community Center

Niagara Gazette — A court-approved referee has been assigned to oversee an ongoing effort to reopen a condemned North End community center.

Adam Perry, a partner with the Buffalo law firm, Hodgson Russ, was selected for the job Tuesday by state Supreme Court Justice Frank Caruso. 

Attorneys involved an an ongoing legal dispute over the association that operates the Niagara Community Center on Centre Avenue acknowledged Perry’s appointment following a meeting with Caruso in his chambers. William Maldovan, a lawyer who is representing the state Attorney General’s Office as the matter proceeds, also participated in Tuesday’s session. 

Perry declined comment immediately following the meeting. 

His father, Sanford Perry, was a long-time director at the center, which closed in 2008 and has since been condemned by city inspectors. 

Falls lawyer Robert Restaino, who represents the plaintiffs in the court case, and Buffalo attorney Steve Pigeon, who represents the defendants, confirmed Perry’s appointment following the meeting in Caruso’s chambers. Both Restaino and Pigeon characterized Perry as a highly professional and ethical attorney whose family’s previous history with the facility made him an appropriate choice for the job. 

“I believe he can be a neutral referee,” Pigeon said. 

The community center traces its roots back to 1928 where it once operated on Erie Avenue as recreational space serving mostly neighborhood youths. Operations moved to the Centre Avenue location in 1952. Center operations have for years been overseen by the Niagara Community Center Association — a non-profit group headed by a board consisting of city residents who are elected by due-paying members. 

Since the building’s closure, several local pastors and residents have called upon current board members to either take steps to reopen the facility or step down so others could assume leadership roles.

In April, a pair of Falls residents claiming to have standing as association board members filed a lawsuit seeking to dissolve the group amid concerns about its assets. Members of the current board — six of which are named as defendants in the case — have consistently said that they have been working on plans to reopen the facility, including efforts to raise funds needed to install new, more energy efficient heating and cooling systems.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Bon Jovi Helps Open Low-income Housing in Philly Pipeline Opponents Protest on National Mall Hagel Gets Preview of New High-tech Projects S.C. Man Apologizes for Naked Walk in Wal-Mart New Country Music Hall of Fame Inductees Named 'Piles' of Bodies in South Sudan Slaughter New Yorkers Celebrate Cherry Blossom Blooms SCOTUS Hears Tv-over-Internet Case Justice Dept. Broadening Criteria for Clemency Chief Mate: Crew Told to Escape After Passengers 'Miss Meadows' Takes Holmes Back to Her Roots Biden: Russia Must Stop Talking, Start Acting David Moyes Out As Manchester United Manager Raw: Leopard Bites Man in India Iowa College Finds Beauty in Bulldogs High Court to Hear Dispute of TV Over Internet Stowaway Teen Forces Review of Airport Security
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results