Niagara Gazette

Local News

August 20, 2013

Sign law comes up for discussion in the Village of Lewiston

(Continued)

Niagara Gazette — But the new proposal eliminates this. It eliminates the signs altogether. And some Lewiston business owners, Simon included, don't like the proposal.

"There should be some sort of regulation," Simon said. "Like a fee every time a sign's left out. If I had to pay $50 every time I forgot to pull my sign in, you better bet I'm bringing my sign in. Money talks."

A complete ban on A-frame signs, which are usually obstructing sidewalks for effectiveness in advertising, would also have an adverse effect on the village government itself.

Marianne Gittermann, director of the village's recreation department, said getting rid of the signs would hurt her department's ability to advertise events the day they're happening. She said she puts her sign out at the start of her events and is quick to bring it in as soon as it's over. But the sign's still being used, which would break the law if the ban is adopted.

So she pleaded with the five-member village board to leave the signs alone or find a more inclusive way of regulating their use.

"As a part of the village, we would definitely follow the law," she said. "But as a part of the village, we also don't have any money to advertise. We rely on our sign. I'd like you to reconsider 'sandwich board' signs."

A final law isn't expected until at least September, as Slagenhoupt finishes his work on it. But finding a way to regulate signs to keep them out of the public right-of-way while allowing businesses and event planners to advertise is a tricky task.

Board members were concerned of any law's effectiveness, questioning how allowing A-frame signs would accomplish what needs to be done.

"It's a fine line between business friendly and trying to maintain the ambiance of the village," Trustee Bruce Sutherland said.

Contact reporter Timothy Chipp at 282-2311, ext. 2251 or follow on Twitter @timchipp.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Raw: Families Travel to Taiwan Plane Crash Site Arizona Execution Takes Almost Two Hours Gen. Odierno Discusses Ukraine, NATO at Forum Gaza Fighting Rages Amid Cease-Fire Efforts Mint Gives JFK Coin a Face-lift Creative Makeovers for Ugly Cellphone Towers Ariz. Inmate Dies 2 Hours After Execution Began Crash Kills Teen Pilot Seeking World Record LeBron James Sends Apology Treat to Neighbors Raw: Funeral for Man Who Died in NYPD Custody Migrants Back in Honduras After US Deports Israeli American Reservist Torn Over Return Raw: ISS Cargo Ship Launches in Kazakhstan Six Indicted in StubHub Hacking Scheme Former NTSB Official: FAA Ban 'prudent' EPA Gets Hip With Kardashian Tweet Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in the Netherlands Biden Decries Voting Restrictions in NAACP Talk Broncos Owner Steps Down Due to Alzheimer's US, UN Push Shuttle Diplomacy in Mideast
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results