Niagara Gazette

Local News

July 3, 2013

Council majority wants to table sales agreement for parcel in downtown hotel project

(Continued)

Niagara Gazette — Acting on a recommendation from USA Niagara, the city council voted in February 2012 to accept the Hamister Group as the project's "preferred developer."

Majority members now say they do not agree with the proposed sale price for the property. While the agreement calls for it to be sold to Hamister for $100,000, Choolokian said he believes, based on an informal estimate he received from City Assessor Jim Byrd, that the city's asking price should be substantially more, perhaps as high as $1.5 million to $2 million. 

Majority members say the $100,000 figure is not adequate for a "prime" piece of real estate located on the edge of Niagara Falls State Park, nor do they believe it is fair to other downtown business and property owners or to city taxpayers. 

"I'd like to see a fair and equitable price that's beneficial to all the people of Niagara Falls," Fruscione said. 

Choolokian and Fruscione and the council's chief of staff, Kevin Ormsby, joined USA Niagara Development Corp. President Chris Schoepflin and Corporation Counsel Craig Johnson to discuss the details of the project on Monday.

Choolokian contends council members were not provided adequate information about the proposal in the months leading up to the meeting. He said he personally would like to know more about the other development ideas that were not chosen during the selection process. 

"We really had no say in this process of picking anybody," Choolokian said.   

Anderson said he has concerns as well and would like them addressed. 

"We want to get this ironed out. That's all," he said. 

In a statement issued in response to questions, USA Niagara spokesperson Laura Magee said the city has been well aware since it unanimously approved Hamister as the preferred developer that its contribution to the project would be the land. At the time, Magee said USA Niagara committed to funding grant incentives needed to move the project forward and the agency "continues to be prepared to do so, subject to our board’s approval."

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming UN Security Council Calls for Gaza Cease-fire Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results