Niagara Gazette

Local News

July 12, 2013

City files injunction to delay SPCA service suspension

Niagara Gazette — Attorneys representing the city of Niagara Falls have filed an injunction seeking to put a temporary stop to the SPCA of Niagara’s plan to suspend animal control services within city limits.

Mayor Paul Dyster said Thursday evening the legal action has been assigned to state Supreme Court Justice Richard Kloch. Dyster said arguments in the case could be heard as early as today.

The move follows an announcement earlier Thursday that members of the SPCA’s board voted to suspend animal control services in Niagara Falls.

SPCA officials said the Lockport Road animal shelter is no longer in a financial position to continue “subsidizing” the services in the city, claiming fees paid under the current contract with Niagara Falls are not covering increased costs for the work involved. The agency is expected to continue providing rescue and cruelty prevention services as needed within city limits. 

“The Niagara County SPCA is not in a financial position to continue subsidizing animal control services for the city,” said SPCA board President Michelle D. Madigan in a release issued Thursday morning. “Without regard to any other shelter concerns or goals, the fees received from the city do not begin to meet the cost of providing services under the current contract.”

The city’s previous contract with the SPCA expired at the end of 2011. The animal shelter billed Niagara Falls $83,520 for animal control services in 2012. The city has been paying for animal control on a month-by-month basis since the original deal ended. 

Madigan said the shelter is currently losing roughly $150,000 per year under the expired arrangement, which is “putting a tremendous financial strain on a nonprofit organization with a very limited budget.” She said the agency’s fiduciary responsibility is to the shelter and to the animals it rescues. 

“We simply can no longer afford to keep servicing animal control for a high need dog population, at the expense of other rescued shelter animals and our overall operations,” Madigan said. “It destroys our budget, taxes our staff, challenges our volunteers, and does not ultimately serve our core mission to prevent cruelty to animals.”

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results