Niagara Gazette

Local News

July 24, 2013

While Hamister watches, council majority refuses to move project forward

Niagara Gazette — A development deal that would see a $25 million mixed-use building go up in downtown Niagara Falls is still alive, but it’s on life support.

The city council voted to keep a proposed development agreement between Buffalo-based developer Hamister Group, USA Niagara Development Corp. and the city tabled during Wednesday’s council meeting after voting to shelf the agreement at the July 8 council meeting. The legislative body does not meet in August, meaning that the issue will not come up for a vote until at least September unless a special meeting is called.

After the council meeting, Mark Hamister, the chairman and CEO of Hamister Group, said his company will walk away from the project if lawmakers do not come to terms and move the process forward soon.

“We are going to try and stay patient for at least another month or two while the appropriate elected officials work out the issues that they have and advance questions,” Hamister said.

But if the agreement does not move forward under the terms that have been negotiated the company will pull up stakes on the project, Hamister said.

“We have enough projects to do elsewhere,” he said.

Hamister said in the coming weeks he will travel to cities — Pittsburgh for example — where he is “highly welcomed” to discuss projects similar to the proposed Falls build.

“This is the only city on our list of projects at the current time where we are experiencing this level of frustration,” he said.

The council’s 3-2 vote to table the agreement at July 8 meeting came after members of the council majority — Council Chairman Glenn Choolokian, Councilman Sam Fruscione and Councilman Robert Anderson, Jr. — began raising questions about the value of the land the city would transfer to the developer for $100,000 as part of the agreement.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Arizona Prison Chief: Execution Wasn't Botched Calif. Police Investigate Peacock Shooting Death Raw: Protesters, Soldiers Clash in West Bank Police: Doctor Who Shot Gunman 'Saved Lives' 'Modern Family' Star on Gay Athletes Coming Out MN Twins Debut Beer Vending Machine DA: Pa. Doctor Fired Back at Hospital Gunman Raw: Iowa Police Dash Cam Shows Wild Chase Obama Seeks Limits on US Company Mergers Abroad Large Family to Share NJ Lottery Winnings U.S. Flights to Israel Resume After Ban Lifted Official: Air Algerie Flight 'probably Crashed' TSA Administrator on Politics and Flight Bans Raw: National Guard Helps Battle WA Wildfires Raw: Ukraine's Donetsk Residents Flee Senators Push to End Hamas Threat in Cease-Fire A Young Victim's Premonition, Hug Before MH17 Raw: Deadly Storm Hits Virginia Campground Death Penalty Expert: 'This is a Turning Point' Raw: MH17 Victim's Bodies Arrive in Netherlands
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results