Niagara Gazette

Local News

March 28, 2013

Water charge criticized

Niagara Gazette — A business owner and several community leaders have called for the Niagara Falls Water Board to eliminate a fee the utility charges to property owners who use no water.

The board charges an "availability charge" to ratepayers who have their meters removed.

David Bieksza, who owns several buildings on 24th Street including a warehouse that uses no water or electricity, told water board members during a meeting Thursday that he was incensed when he saw the fee had doubled, from $30 each quarter to $60.

"I get a water bill for a building where not one drop of water is being used," Bieksza said.

Bieksza, who ran an auto service garage on 24th Street before retiring several years ago, said he feels it is unjust that he should have to pay $240 a year for a service that he does not use.

He, and other property owners, would be using the money being paid to the utility to improve their properties if not for the fee, Bieksza argued.

"You shouldn't do this to good, taxpaying people trying to keep their properties up," Bieksza said.

Roger Spuback, president of the Niagara Falls Block Club Council, also spoke to the board saying that to raise the rate so quickly was unfair.

"This seems like one is being financially punished for using no water whatsoever," Spurback said.

Spurback went on to say that rates in general have been climbing too quickly over the years.

"Higher rates will further impede people from settling in this community," Spurback said.

County Legislator Jason Zona, D-Niagara Falls, also spoke at the meeting, requesting that the board consider lessening or eliminating the fee.

"It's a small bone to throw to the ratepayers in this county," Zona said.

Paul Drof, the board's executive director, said the charge - which was first included in the 2007 budget and increased to $60 in the 2012 budget - is in place because, although the property owner is not using any water, the plant still processes water that comes off of the property and washes into the sewers.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Raw: Kangaroo Rescued From Swimming Pool Raw: 3 American Doctors Killed in Afghanistan Raw: Obama Arrives at State Dinner in Tokyo Raw: Obama Plays Soccer With Japanese Robot Raw: Obama Visits Meiji Shrine in Tokyo Stars Talk Guns N' Roses at Golden Gods New Pictures of Ship That Sank in 1888 Oregon Gay Marriage Ban Goes to Court SKorea Ferry Toll Hits 156, Search Gets Tougher Video Shows Possible Syrian Gas Attack Admirers Flock to Dole During Kansas Homecoming FBI Joining Probe of Suburban NY 'Swatting' Call U.S. Paratroopers in Poland, Amid Ukraine Crisis US Reviews Clemency for Certain Inmates Michigan Man Sees Thanks to 'bionic Eye'
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results