Niagara Gazette

Local News

February 22, 2013

CITY SPENDING: Taxpayer-funded city council sessions at local restaurants draw mixed reviews

Niagara Gazette — For many years in the city of Niagara Falls, a majority of city council members have gathered in between scheduled, publicly announced bi-monthly meetings for dinners at local restaurants.

In what has evolved into something of a tradition, the cost for the meals has been covered by taxpayer dollars.  

When asked for his opinion on the legality of the meetings by the Niagara Gazette, the state’s leading expert on open government rules — Robert J. Freeman — questioned the practice, especially when it involves a group of city lawmakers representing the council majority and when the cost of their meals are being covered with city funds. 

“We generally assume that when the majority of a council has gathered that the open meeting law applies,” said Freeman, the executive director of the state’s Committee on Open Government.

Any gathering of a public body where a majority of elected or appointed members are present forms a quorum — the minimum number of members required to conduct public business. Under state law, such gatherings are to be announced to the press one week in advance and be posted in a public space at least 72 hours ahead of time.

Freeman said that since city taxpayers are picking up the tab for the council meals, the conclusion can be made that lawmakers must be conducting city business while eating out together.

If during the course of their taxpayer-funded dinners council members discuss anything related to city business and it is not protected by attorney client privilege, then Freeman believes those in attendance are in violation of the law.

“They can’t have it both ways,” Freeman said. “If the city is paying for the meals, one can only assume that the members of the council and other city officials would be there in the performance of their duties.”

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results