Niagara Gazette

Local News

February 28, 2013

Council majority cutting out meals -- and watching every cent

Niagara Gazette — A trio of city lawmakers plan to operate as their own "control board" in Niagara Falls and are looking to impose a freeze on the use of city funds for trips, consultants and other "non-essential" items, including their own taxpayer-funded meals. 

Members of the council majority — Chairman Glenn Choolokian, Robert Anderson Jr. and Sam Fruscione — have introduced a resolution authorizing the council to "act as a control board" while imposing a freeze on spending for consultants, engineering studies, training, conferences, travel events, concerts, advertising and all meals, including those involving council members themselves.

The resolution calls upon City Controller Maria Brown to submit monthly expenditure reports to Choolokian and asks that all "requests to move and or spend money" be submitted for council review. The resolution argues that the freeze will prevent the possibility of an "unexpected tax increase mid-year along with layoffs and reduction of essential city services." It is expected to be considered for a council vote on Monday and would take effect immediately upon approval.

The resolution cites the city's ongoing financial problems as the reason behind the move, suggesting the 2013 budget faces a potential structural deficit of about $7 million as a result of anticipated revenues that may not materialize, including $5.3 million in casino cash and 2012 appropriated fund balance. 

On Thursday, Choolokian said the measure is aimed at curtailing as much spending — and thus creating as much savings — as possible at a time when the city is experiencing significant financial challenges, including a lack of cash flow. 

"We're just trying to get an early start on everything and tighten up everybody's belt," he said. 

Last April, city lawmakers, with the administration's approval, adopted a resolution calling for a department-wide freeze on all discretionary spending. 

Mayor Paul Dyster noted that the council and the administration were on the same page in adopting last year's freeze. He believes a "number of issues" exist with the new measure and said he questions whether a majority of council members have the legal authority to "act as a control board" and if the council chairman has the ability to assume oversight of things like budget transfers and spending.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case Author Gabriel Garcia Marquez Dead at 87 Chelsea Clinton Is Pregnant Flamingo Frenzy Ahead of Zoo Construction Crew Criticized Over Handling of Ferry Disaster Agreement Reached to Calm Ukraine Tensions Boston Bombing Survivors One Year Later
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results