Niagara Gazette

Local News

August 15, 2013

Covanta hearing draws crowd to city hall

Niagara Gazette — Residents, company employees and politicians filed into city council chambers Wednesday night to hear a presentation from a waste-to-energy company on an expansion of their facilities and offer comment on the project.

The meeting was called by the city's planning board after residents raised concerns over the plant’s expansion plans and called on the board to revisit a negative declaration it approved earlier this year as part of a required state environmental review, clearing the way for the expansion.

Rick Smith, the planning board chairman, said that the meeting was informational and that the board was not considering any further action at this time.

The city will consider all information collected and provide that information to Corporation Counsel Craig Johnson, Smith said.

“The board has no pending action,” Smith said. “However, we will work with staff to bring all the information provided to us to the city corporation counsel and ask for his evaluation as to the city’s legal options going forward.”

While company representatives argued that the expansion project will be beneficial to the city — creating jobs and reducing the number of garbage trucks on city streets — most residents expressed concerns over possible health risks and the company’s 15-year tax abatement deal granted by the Niagara County Industrial Development Agency in January.

Kevin O’Neil, the business manager at Covanta Niagara, gave the same presentation that was given at a planning board meeting before the board voted to approve the negative declaration on the state environmental review, adding updated information where necessary.

O’Neil outlined the plans, which include the reopening of a rail spur that will allow the company to accept garbage from New York City by rail, a brownfield remediation and storm water drainage improvements.

O’Neil emphasized that the plant expansion will not result in the incinerating of any more waste than the 821,000 they are permitted to burn each year by the Department of Environmental Conservation, the same amount that has been processed at the plant since it opened in 1980.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results