Niagara Gazette — A bid by a group of local factory workers to obtain compensation for health problems they believe resulted from exposure to toxic uranium dust received a boost this week from a federal lawmaker representing Western New York.
U.S. Rep. Brian Higgins, D-Niagara Falls and Buffalo, issued a letter to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, asking officials there to take action on behalf of Bethlehem Steel retirees who worked in the Lackawanna plant from 1952 to 1976.
In his letter delivered to NIOSH officials Thursday, Higgins to "move swiftly" to extend the "residual contamination period," a move that would allow retirees and their families to obtain compensation for illnesses they believed were tied to the type of work they did while on the job at the steel plant.
Workers who were employed at Bethlehem Steel and other Niagara-area plants, including Hooker Electrochemical and Electro Metallurgical in Niagara Falls, have for years been lobbying federal officials for compensation as a result of their exposure to workplace radiation during the 1940s and 1950s. Many of those factory workers attribute various illnesses they acquired to their on-the-job exposure during the Cold War Era.
In 2010, the Secretary of Health and Human Services finally granted a Special Exposure Cohort for those who worked at Bethlehem Steel, between 1949-1952, while uranium was actively rolled.
Workers have since presented additional evidence which they say shows inadequate cleanup and exposure occurred well beyond 1952 and that no serious mitigation was undertaken until 1976. In August, at the request of Higgins and others in the federal delegation, representatives from NIOSH met with retired steel workers in WNY to receive firsthand accounts from witnesses who worked at the plant.
Higgins helped organize a meeting in August that allowed NIOSH officials to hear firsthand accounts from a group of retired Bethlehem Steel workers. He said those workers have provided "mounting evidence" that the Lackawanna rolling mill was subject to an "inadequate clean-up of uranium rolling" conducted during 1949 to 1952 as well as "further government-sanctioned" uranium rolling that took place "past that time period."