Niagara Gazette

Local News

January 25, 2013

Women in combat long overdue

Niagara Gazette — Often when we look back on the milestones of progress, it is with a sense of disbelief that the path to achieving them was so long and hard-fought. 

It boggles the mind that, only 50 years ago, interracial marriage was still illegal in many states, and that 100 years ago, women could not legally vote. 

It is in this light that we may one day look back on Jan. 24, 2013, when Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta announced that the U.S. military would allow women to serve in combat roles. 

“Career success and their specific opportunities should be based solely on their ability to successfully carry out an assigned mission, Panetta said Thursday. “Everyone deserves that chance.”

The arguments against allowing women in combat have long sounded inane, outdated or insulting. 

Pfc. Dalton Trimble was quoted on National Public Radio on Thursday morning voicing one rather inane sentiment.  

If “there’s going to be women around, you’re going to have to watch what you say now,” Trimble said. “There’s going to be a whole lot of changes.”

Trimble may be suggesting that women are so sensitive that they must be shielded from rough language. This is ridiculous. Offensive language and vulgarities are objectionable to some people and no big deal to others, regardless of sex. 

Trimble may also mean that he and his fellow infantrymen are accustomed to speaking about certain subjects, such as women and sex, in a way that a woman might find offensive. If the presence of a woman in Trimble’s company makes him think twice about the wisdom of such statements, all the better. 

The larger issue is usually that women shouldn’t be allowed in combat because they are not fit for the job. This idea that we can paint huge swaths of the population with a broad brush and label them unfit is as outdated as eugenics. No man makes it to the front lines without passing rigorous tests of his physical, mental and emotional fitness. 

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Amphibious Landing Practice in Hawaii Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results