Niagara Gazette

Local News

January 22, 2013

Village, town talking water consolidation

Niagara Gazette — LEWISTON — Change may be coming to the Village of Lewiston's water billing.

Though no decision has been made, village Engineer Richard San Giacomo presented a cost comparison between Village of Lewiston residential water bills and what the town would charge residents should it take over. The news is mixed in terms of cost savings.

"A few months back, the town came to the village and made an offer to take over its water," San Giacomo said. "We wanted to find out if there would be significant savings to residents if we have our water owned by the town." 

According to San Giacomo, about 62.5 percent of village residents would pay more in water charges should the town assume control. In addition, about 14 percent would save less than $25 per year.

Those figures are based on a sample size of 253 village customers, varying in both usage amounts and property value. Village water, billed every three months, charges residential use $3.55 per 100 cubic feet. The town, meanwhile, automatically charges its customers $14.90 every two months – its billing cycle – and $1.70 per 100 cubic feet for all additional use.

In terms of averages, San Giacomo said, a household valued at $100,000 using 6,400 cubic feet of water annually, would pay $227.20 in the current system and $213.05 if the town assumed control. The cost savings of switching also increases as property values increase and water usage increases, he said.

But residents who leave the area for a period of time during the year would likely see their bills increase dramatically, he said.

Snowbirds, as they're called, who leave for the winter, use considerably less water throughout the year, meaning the town's minimum fee would cause costs to increase from $79.40 annually in the current system to $173 if the town assumed control.

"Village residents will pay a minimum even when they're out of town (with a switch)," he said. "If you have your water shut off, even in the months you're not here, you'll still have to pay the minimum to the town."

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming UN Security Council Calls for Gaza Cease-fire Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results