Niagara Gazette

Local News

October 7, 2013

Community questions bring explanation on Lewiston's lack of funding of CWM expansion fight

Niagara Gazette — With Lewiston Town Board members entering preliminary work on the budget recently, rumors began quickly circulating the town has not been funding its portion of a county-led effort to fight the expansion of Chemical Waste Management through an Albany-based attorney.

Environmentalist residents and members of the watchdog group Residents for Responsible Government, which operates mostly in Lewiston and Porter, circulated flyers during the recent Harvest Festival in the Village of Lewiston, calling for the town to continue the fight against the disposal company and once again begin contributing to the financial .

“CWM wants to expand its operations with a new hazardous waste landfill,” the flyer states. “Niagara County and the Town of Lewiston have pledged to fight this expansion. The lawyer the county has retained has done an excellent job and is very close to winning the case to prevent the expansion. However, the Town of Lewiston has not contributed any funds in the last four years to help the county pay for its legal expenses.”

Though the town has not contributed money to the legal fund since 2009, town finance manager Michael Johnson said it’s for a very specific reason. He said the town simply hasn’t been asked to pay since former Supervisor Fred Newlin left office.

Originally, he said, the agreement between the two municipalities was a verbal one, where the county would spend $50,000 on attorney Gary Abraham and, if needed, would bill the town for up to $50,000 as supplemental.

The first year was 2006, when the county asked for three payments totaling $50,000 to cover the cost. Nothing was reported in 2007, but a total of eight bills were submitted by the county the next year, also totaling $50,000. There was only one $50,000 invoice submitted in 2009, paid the last day of that year.

In case there ever is a new bill submitted by Niagara County for Abraham’s services, Johnson said there is money available to cover the expense. It just isn’t set aside in the 2014 preliminary budget like it was in 2009 under a different supervisor.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Amphibious Landing Practice in Hawaii
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results