Niagara Gazette

Local News

March 16, 2013

Tonawanda Coke manager demoted?

Plant's lawyer calls Cahill's reassignment temporary after News inquiry

Niagara Gazette — BUFFALO — Lawyers on opposing sides of the Tonawanda Coke trial disagreed Friday as to whether the plant’s superintendent was demoted after testifying for the prosecution against his employer last week.

Pat Cahill, who was plant superintendent when he testified March 6 in federal court, said he could not confirm or deny any such demotion when a Tonawanda News reporter called him Thursday night. 

But a different Tonawanda Coke employee, who answered the factory’s listed number Thursday evening, said the current plant superintendent was a man by the name of Bob, and not Pat Cahill. 

The last time the News called Tonawanda Coke to verify Cahill’s job title — the day he testified — the person answering confirmed Cahill was, at least at that point, the plant superintendent.

Friday morning in federal court, with the jury not yet in the courtroom, Gregory Linsin, Tonawanda Coke’s attorney, raised the issue before Judge William Skretny, saying Cahill’s lawyer had informed him of the News’ inquiry. 

He said that Cahill, who was formerly a foreman in the byproducts department before being named superintendent, was asked to “temporarily” return to his old job due to two exhaustion failures that were the result of operator error. 

“He is still acting as the plant superintendent and signing documents,” Linsin said. 

Linsin asked Skretny to tell the jury that media reports are “not always accurate.”

“Somehow, a reporter obtained his cell phone number,” Linsin said. “I can’t control the accuracy of media reports, but I wanted to bring this to the court’s attention.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Aaron Mango objected, arguing Linsin’s request to warn the jury was too extreme. 

“The press has the right to investigate and inquire,” Mango said.

He also contradicted Linsin’s account of Cahill’s job status, saying he is no longer acting as plant superintendent.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results