Niagara Gazette

Local News

March 16, 2013

Soft drink law just falls flat

Niagara Gazette — New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s heart was in the right place on the sugary-beverage ban he proposed, but his head wasn’t.

The way the would-be law was constructed, it was so unfair to so many interests that it stood no chance of being enacted.

Bloomberg, an outspoken advocate for healthy living, was moved by statistics that show obesity to be a leading and growing American health problem. It’s aggravating to the mayor and others because it is a problem that, in a sizable percentage of cases, can be corrected by a simple concept: will power.

That’s not to say that if everyone laid off giant sodas there would be no obesity. Many overweight people had the stage set for their dimensions when their genes were activated. Others have health conditions over which they have no control.

But Bloomberg is on to something. Sugary drinks are the undoing of too many potentially healthy people — and are significant contributors to health costs for all of us, as a result.

So in the interests of overweight individuals and the rest of the paying public, Bloomberg declared that containers of over 16 ounces of non-diet soft drinks would be banned in New York City eateries.

The trouble was, he said nothing about exotic creamy, sugary coffee drinks, and he said nothing about stores that sold 32-ouncers. According to the State Supreme Court, that made the law arbitrary and, therefore, unenforceable.

The mayor, in typical Bloomberg fashion, reacted by saying the fight was not over. He insisted he will appeal and win.

But he will have to make some changes, whether he likes it or not. Government fiat regarding big containers of soda is not the same as limiting alcohol or tobacco sales.

For one thing, while health-care costs are unquestionably the responsibility of every citizen, alcohol and tobacco consumption have an even more direct effect on innocent bystanders. Drunk drivers kill indiscriminately, and so does second-hand smoke. You don’t have to be drinking or smoking to suffer the consequences of those activities. Big soft drinks aren’t going to hurt anyone but the over-user.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction Malaysian PM: Stop Fighting in Ukraine Cantor Warns of Instability, Terror in Farewell Ravens' Ray Rice: 'I Made a Huge Mistake' Florida Panther Rebound Upsets Ranchers Small Plane Crash in San Diego Parking Lot Busy Franco's Not Afraid of Overexposure Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results