Niagara Gazette

Local News

October 5, 2012

Harassment suit settled


Niagara Gazette — Witryol said she was aware of the lawsuit filed against Aronow but did not discuss it publicly until now because she wanted the legal proceedings to play out. Now that a settlement has been reached, Witryol said she believes taxpayers deserve to know how the state intends to pay for it and where it will get the money from. 

"Taxpayers paid $90,000 and that's just the settlement, not including the costs for representation," Witryol said. "Now, taxpayer money is involved."

Maziarz insisted he wasn't aware of the pending civil lawsuit against Aronow when he joined his staff in 2009. Upon learning of this fact, Maziarz said he gave Aronow the presumption of innocence, while stressing that "anything other than full exoneration, including a settlement in which he did not admit to wrongdoing, would lead to his termination."

Maziarz said he "promptly" asked for Aronow's resignation last November after his former staff member informed him that settlement negotiations had started.

"There are no allegations against me or my staff," Maziarz said in a statement released Friday afternoon. "The incident Amy mentions took place in a different senate office. The plaintiff’s attorney has stated that I’ve had nothing to do with any of this. In my 17 years in the Senate, I have never had any incidents at all on my staff. I would never tolerate or condone any of the alleged actions.  I also absolutely do not support using taxpayer dollars for these legal settlements."

Witryol characterized Aronow as a "key Maziarz operative," noting that he has not only worked for the state in the senator's office, but has been involved in Maziarz's re-election campaign, including efforts to pass designation petitions the senator needed to secure spots on this year's primary and general election ballots. Witryol said it's "reasonable to assume" Aronow continues to work for Maziarz, regardless of which payroll he's on and suggested the settlement issue raises "serious questions about Maziarz's "judgment and ethics."

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results