Niagara Gazette

Local News

April 9, 2013

Falls Bridge Commission lawsuit languishes

Niagara Gazette — BUFFALO — It’s been almost two and a half years since U.S. District Court Judge Richard Arcara asked lawyers for the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission why they were keeping secrets from the public.

But despite the judge’s concerns, he still has not ruled on a lawsuit brought by two local lawmakers seeking to force the commission to comply with the federal Freedom of Information Act.

Arguments between lawyers for then Niagara County Legislators John Ceretto, and Danny Sklarski and attorneys for the bridge commission took place in U.S. District Court in Buffalo on Oct. 21, 2010. Since then, Cerretto has moved on and been elected a New York state assemblyman, while Sklarski left the Niagara County Legislature and became a councilman in the Town of Niagara.

Sklarski admitted he hasn’t given the lawsuit much thought in the intervening years.

“I’ll be honest with you,” he told a reporter, “I haven’t thought the first thing (about the lawsuit) since you just brought it up.”

Cerretto said he has just been waiting patiently for Arcara to rule.

“When we (brought the lawsuit), we did it because we thought the people had a right to know what (the bridge commission was doing),” Cerretto said. “I think boards and commissions should be accountable.”

Cerretto said he has had some contact with the lawyers who represented him and Sklarski in the case since the last court appearance. Sklarski, however, said he has not heard so much as a “whisper” from the attorneys.

“(The lawyers) told me the judge will rule when he’s ready and there’s not much to do until then,” Cerretto said.  

Ted Graney, a partner in the law firm Webster Szanyi, who represented the two local lawmakers could not be reached for comment. Attorneys for the bridge commission were also unavailable.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Amphibious Landing Practice in Hawaii
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results