Niagara Gazette

Local News

May 15, 2013

'Negative outlook' for Falls finances from bond agency

Niagara Gazette — The city’s financial standing has taken another hit.

Moody’s Investor Services announced this week that it has downgraded its bond rating for the city of Niagara Falls from Baa1 to Baa3, while assigning a “negative outlook.”

It marks the second time this year the agency lowered the city’s bond rating. In January, the firm dropped its rating to Baa1 from A2 while placing the city’s credit worthiness under review for a possible further downgrade.

Agencies like Moody’s assign bond ratings as a measure of a municipality’s financial condition. Higher ratings are generally viewed as a sign of financial soundness, while lower ratings tend to cause municipal governments to pay larger interest rates when borrowing and, thus, incur additional expenses.

In its statement concerning the ratings downgrade, Moody’s expressed concern about the city’s financial situation, largely as a result of the ongoing casino revenue dispute between the Seneca Nation of Indians and the state of New York.

“The Baa3 rating incorporates the city’s highly stressed liquidity position that the city currently faces given the continued remittance of casino revenue,” Moody’s concluded. “The rating also incorporates the city’s weak economy, high unemployment, depressed income levels, and elevated debt position. The negative outlook reflects the city’s projected depletion of cash as early as November 2013 if the money due from the Seneca Nation is not remitted or an alternate liquidity source is not identified.”

The Senecas stopped paying the state casino revenue agreed upon in the 2002 gaming compact in 2009 because, they say, the state violated the exclusivity clause in that contract. About $600 million has been withheld since, without roughly $60 million of the total owed to the city.

Moody’s acknowledges that, depending on how the conflict between the state and Senecas is resolved, the city’s bond rating could soon be changing again.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Amphibious Landing Practice in Hawaii
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results