Niagara Gazette

Local News

October 16, 2012

Senecas win appeal in Sue-Perior case

Niagara Gazette — A state appeals court has sided with the Seneca Nation of Indians in a legal dispute involving a local contractor that has performed work at several Seneca-owned properties in Western New York.

Officials from the Seneca Nation announced Tuesday that the New York State Appellate Division rejected a lawsuit against 17 officers from two Seneca-owned companies who were accused by the West Seneca firm, Sue-Perior Concrete and Paving, of non-payment of contract and other contractual failures. 

“Not only did the appeals court reaffirm fundamental principles of tribal sovereign immunity as applied to tribal officials, but the judges carefully explained why Sue/Perior’s complaint was insufficiently pled as a matter of law," Seneca Nation President Robert Odawi Porter said in a statement released by the nation on Tuesday. "It is a very good case precedent to have reaffirmed in New York law.” 

In 2010, Sue-Perior Concrete and Paving filed lawsuit against Seneca Nation companies and several employees, claiming they failed to make good on contractual obligations related to work performed by Sue-Perior at various Seneca-owned properties. 

Last year, State Supreme Court Justice John Michelek denied the case, but allowed proceedings to continue against 17 individual officers of the Seneca companies. The Seneca companies appealed to the Appellate Division, saying the officers were also protected by sovereign immunity. A release from the Seneca Nation issued Tuesday indicated that the five-judge appeals court agreed, ruling that the individual officers of the Seneca companies never worked outside their capacities as corporation officers.

Elizabeth Kraengel, an attorney representing Sue-Perior Concrete, did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday. 

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow Raw: Deadly Tornado Hits Virginia Campground Ohio State Marching Band Chief Fired After Probe Raw: Big Rig Stuck in Illinois Swamp
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results