Niagara Gazette

Editorials

December 20, 2012

EDITORIAL: Gun control - not ban - should start solution

Niagara Gazette — Discussion about how to end gun violence in this country has dominated the national conversation for days, following the horrific events in Newtown, Conn. Friday.

Talk of quick-fixes, from banning and destroying all firearms to arming every citizen with an automatic rifle to intimidate criminals from taking actions on thoughts of violence, have begun to dominate both Internet chatter and that of Washington politicians.

The problem with these extreme options is they’re impossible to accomplish.

Mass shootings, as President Barack Obama said Sunday addressing the nation from the previously quiet western Connecticut town, cannot be eliminated through any single law or set of laws. It’s a multi-faceted issue with its solutions located partly in the mental health field, partly in new gun control laws and partly within schools and households across the country.

In the end, we believe this is only the opening act to reverse the violence which has infiltrated American culture. Guns aren’t the root of the issue. They’re simply a single leaf on a flourishing branch.

We, as a nation, need to be proactive with our approach rather than reactionary; mindful and vigilant rather than headstrong and incomplete. Though the ban of guns would be a favorable scenario for furthering a truly peaceful country, humans are far from the peaceful beings we tell ourselves we are.  With guns gone, there’d still be other means of killing – but the potential for mass murder would be greatly reduced.

There are other fixes out there, ones which are less infringing on second amendment rights of citizens, which was designed, like each of the items of the Bill of Rights, to ensure a person’s ability to protect himself, his land and his country. While members of Congress such as Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), discuss an outright ban on assault weapons following decades of lax laws, perhaps they should consider a change which doesn’t disrupt the rights of Americans to own guns while making it harder for individuals to commit mass murder.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorials
Featured Ads
House Ads
AP Video
Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Front page