Niagara Gazette — ‘Water, water, everywhere ...’
Is there really that much? Everyday we’re swamped with stories about hydrofracking and widespread concerns that the process is unsafe and a potential threat to our environment.
Proponents have argued that hydrofracking will create countless jobs, especially for the economically-depressed upstate communities. Opponents contend that drilling and fracking could lead to polluting the streams and
No one seems to ever mention, however, the sheer amount of water that would be consumed. Mostly we’re simply told the process uses a mixture of chemicals, sand and highly pressurized water to smash the shale — thousands of feet below the surface — to extract natural gas.
How much water? Our Ohio neighbors estimate that as much as 5 million gallons per well are needed to break up their Utica shale and release the natural gas trapped underground. One official said that if every well in Carroll County is drilled, companies will use some 805 million gallons of water to free the gas and oil. The Buckeye State also estimates that upward of 2,250 wells could be drilled there by the end of 2015.
A Dayton Daily News article notes that 2010 records in Carroll County showed that residents, farms and businesses drew 378 million gallons of water from the ground, lakes and streams.
For the record, hydraulic fracturing in New York may not become a reality for some time yet, if ever, based on the state Assembly vote Thursday, 95-40, approving a two-year moratorium so vital health impact studies may be completed. State Sen. David Carlucci of the Independent Democratic Conference proposed a similar two-year ban earlier in the week but its support remains unclear since the IDC shares power with the Senate Republicans. The GOP has tended to favor the gas drilling plan.
Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver told reporters that although the majority Democratic conference is eager to address the economic problems upstate, it is important to make certain that fracking will not pose risks to human health or the environment. Thus, the moratorium is appropriate until the impact studies are finished, he added.