Niagara Gazette — You can absolutely disagree with someone, and both of you can still be absolutely right. That depends, of course, that each person sees different sides of the same argument. Take the ridiculous gun buy-back programs that politicians and the police departments have. If you listen to me on many Tuesdays with Sandy Beach and Company on WBEN 930AM/107.7FM, you will hear us talk about how ridiculous these photo-op politicians are in their belief that criminals are going to turn in their guns, find the Lord and change their lives as a result of them. And we are absolutely right! They ain’t gonna do it. That’s my argument, and I am sticking to it. However, I have long said that how you come out of an argument is largely contingent upon where you entered it – and most of the time, we enter an argument from where we are and through the things that we sense. Sometimes, our objections to the participants actually colors and clouds the objective issues of what is actually happening, Upon my realization that I was doing such, I have to change a large part of my argument about these buy-back programs. I admit it. With more perfect information, I am willing to take a more perfect view of anything; and here’s why. I was at a gun buy-back program sponsored by Niagara Falls’ MADD DADDS and the police department. I was impressed with the quantity, quality and types of firearms that people turned in. I was particularly impressed with a very nice .38 that someone surrendered and it was still in the packaging. Impressive, yes! But change-your-mind-about-gun-buyback-programs impressive — no. What impressed me into rethinking my position about the program was those who were turning in their weapons. Some of those citizens reminded me of footage that I saw on the television news late last year. Video from a neighbor’s security camera in Buffalo caught two young thugs breaking in the home of a senior who was well into his 90s. What could a 90-year-old man have in his house that would make someone go through the trouble of a break-in, such as those men did? Then, at the gun buy-back program in Niagara Falls, I saw some pretty senior people turning in their weapons. It then I hit me. Even though the cops had been saying it all along, I only saw things from my own middle-aged perspective, and through that proverbial and oft overused exclamation of, “If it was me, then I would …” Well, it ain’t me; it was them – those who either could no longer safely operate, or properly and securely store a weapon. It was easy for me to surmise that most of those who turned in a weapon would probably be better off without one. In thus doing, it made society better off, too, because no one could steal it from them. I asked one MADD DADD why people would want to turn in those weapons. He said, with delight, “It makes them feel good.” I can agree that there is some merit to gun buy-back programs. It is good that those who cannot properly operate and secure a weapon making both society and themselves safer by surrendering them. However, I am sticking by my guns in that criminals are not surrendering their weapons and that those citizens who are traditionally law-abiding and of sound enough body and mind to safely operate and store a weapon ought not have their rights infringed upon by photo-op politicians who need not to be involved in the process. Without indicting anyone, I think that it is better that police agencies and community groups exclusively operate these events. It would be in the best interest that politicians, who actually stand in front of such issues and often block others from seeing the mind-changing side of the issue that I saw in such programs. In so doing, the best results are likely follow, along with the most support that can be had by those in the media who can turn actually public policy. Gun buy-back programs are not as dumb as I thought, and nor am I. How about you? Can you amend your views upon a second thought?Contact Ken Hamilton at email@example.com.
- LETTERS FROM THE ISLAND: Quest for an appointment comes up short We're rolling up our sleeves for Quest. The Big Mac of blood tests, the Tops of tourniquets, the Sears of screenings, opens on our Island at Monday's crack of dawn.
- VINCENT DAVIS: Pledge your allegiance to the Slurpee, America's treat By now you must be aware that it is, in fact, summer. And since summer is a season not characterized by any obvious weather events (sometimes it's hot for days in a row, sometimes you get a bunch of rainy days and chilly nights) but instead activities, I'd like to bring attention to an underrated staple of summer sun enjoyment: Consuming the brain freeze-inducing snack classic, the Slurpee.
- HAMILTON: Popeye's '7-Minute' guide to educating southerners -- and me! Writer Mark Twain said that when he 14, his father was so ignorant that he could hardly stand to have the old man around. But upon turning 21, Twain said that he was astonished by how much his father had learned in just seven years.
- DELUCA: Wegmans call warns of bad fruit I was humming to myself the other day, getting ready for work on a lovely summer morning, when I decided to check my messages on the house phone. I hit the play button and heard a message from Wegmans warning me about some fruit that I had bought at their store. As quick as that, a message with the scary potential to change my life or the life of someone I love.
- GLYNN: Ortt jumps on drive to repeal the SAFE Act It was a no-brainer for North Tonawanda Mayor Rob Ortt, a Republican candidate for the 62nd Senate District seat, to join the forces to repeal the state's SAFE Act.
- Verplank: Turn back the clock at the Porter Cup
- BRADBERRY: Tourists attracted here by history, beauty, politics As my friend and colleague, writer Don Glynn has so artfully portrayed over the decades, "For many years after the dawn of aviation, U.S. presidents visiting Western New York started at the Niagara Falls Airport. The reason: The main runway here was longer than that of the Buffalo airport and could easily accommodate Air Force One, the presidential aircraft."
- CONFER: A constitutional convention is not the answer For the past few years it has been popular for folks of the right persuasion (Republicans and neoconservatives) to call for a constitutional convention ("Con-Con") in hopes of passing a balanced budget amendment (BBA.) A lot of people have jumped on that bandwagon; no doubt your email inbox or Facebook news feeds have shown that.
CITY DESK: Hobel will be missed
Lost in all the hoopla surrounding last week’s announced retirement of state Sen. George Maziarz, R-Newfane, was the loss of another well-known figure in local government and politics.
- HIGGS: More pastors, a new church and more of everything Before I go further back in time, I want to just go back to last week where I took my own advice and spent a couple of hours at the Como, where I enjoyed one of their traditional "parade of bowls and plates of great salads, pasta and meat dishes" and listened to longtime friends of Tom Darro roast him with humor, accolades and best wishes. And best of all no one who came to the microphone mentioned garbage totes or carts. It was a welcome relief.
- More Columns Headlines