Niagara Gazette — You can absolutely disagree with someone, and both of you can still be absolutely right. That depends, of course, that each person sees different sides of the same argument. Take the ridiculous gun buy-back programs that politicians and the police departments have. If you listen to me on many Tuesdays with Sandy Beach and Company on WBEN 930AM/107.7FM, you will hear us talk about how ridiculous these photo-op politicians are in their belief that criminals are going to turn in their guns, find the Lord and change their lives as a result of them. And we are absolutely right! They ain’t gonna do it. That’s my argument, and I am sticking to it. However, I have long said that how you come out of an argument is largely contingent upon where you entered it – and most of the time, we enter an argument from where we are and through the things that we sense. Sometimes, our objections to the participants actually colors and clouds the objective issues of what is actually happening, Upon my realization that I was doing such, I have to change a large part of my argument about these buy-back programs. I admit it. With more perfect information, I am willing to take a more perfect view of anything; and here’s why. I was at a gun buy-back program sponsored by Niagara Falls’ MADD DADDS and the police department. I was impressed with the quantity, quality and types of firearms that people turned in. I was particularly impressed with a very nice .38 that someone surrendered and it was still in the packaging. Impressive, yes! But change-your-mind-about-gun-buyback-programs impressive — no. What impressed me into rethinking my position about the program was those who were turning in their weapons. Some of those citizens reminded me of footage that I saw on the television news late last year. Video from a neighbor’s security camera in Buffalo caught two young thugs breaking in the home of a senior who was well into his 90s. What could a 90-year-old man have in his house that would make someone go through the trouble of a break-in, such as those men did? Then, at the gun buy-back program in Niagara Falls, I saw some pretty senior people turning in their weapons. It then I hit me. Even though the cops had been saying it all along, I only saw things from my own middle-aged perspective, and through that proverbial and oft overused exclamation of, “If it was me, then I would …” Well, it ain’t me; it was them – those who either could no longer safely operate, or properly and securely store a weapon. It was easy for me to surmise that most of those who turned in a weapon would probably be better off without one. In thus doing, it made society better off, too, because no one could steal it from them. I asked one MADD DADD why people would want to turn in those weapons. He said, with delight, “It makes them feel good.” I can agree that there is some merit to gun buy-back programs. It is good that those who cannot properly operate and secure a weapon making both society and themselves safer by surrendering them. However, I am sticking by my guns in that criminals are not surrendering their weapons and that those citizens who are traditionally law-abiding and of sound enough body and mind to safely operate and store a weapon ought not have their rights infringed upon by photo-op politicians who need not to be involved in the process. Without indicting anyone, I think that it is better that police agencies and community groups exclusively operate these events. It would be in the best interest that politicians, who actually stand in front of such issues and often block others from seeing the mind-changing side of the issue that I saw in such programs. In so doing, the best results are likely follow, along with the most support that can be had by those in the media who can turn actually public policy. Gun buy-back programs are not as dumb as I thought, and nor am I. How about you? Can you amend your views upon a second thought?Contact Ken Hamilton at email@example.com.
DELUCA: Can the dead really talk?
I am fascinated by mediums — people who say they can talk to the dead.
- GLYNN: Local history books prove popular for Christmas Every year at this time you hear the complaint that it's a a real chore to find the right Christmas gift.
- BRADBERRY: Let's shop till we drop … locally So, now that Black Friday and Cyber Monday have come and gone and the annual shopping spree has officially begun, let's shop … "tis the Season!"
CONFER: Common Core: Welcome to more of the same
It's not coincidental that as standardized testing has become the norm at all grade levels nationwide, the outcomes have suffered. The 'new' rage in education, Common Core State Standards, promises more of the same.
- HIGGS: A look at a few neighborhood landmarks We started our series on landmarks buildings with schools and now we are delving into churches. There are a few obvious towering landmarks which will eventually be written about here, but I felt the need to go into the neighborhoods (which is where most of my thoughts are centered anyway) to fish out a few landmarks there.
- GUEST VIEW: Wednesday referendum: Old vacancy costs vs. new revenue The Niagara Falls City School District land sale referendum on Wednesday is very important. It is both a public vote and a community business decision. Do we want to live with blighted buildings until we pay to demolish them, or do we want to see them responsibly renovated in our lifetimes? The vote lets the public chose new tax revenue and blight elimination versus costly government ownership of vacant buildings.
- GLYNN: April & Nino won Grammy for '63 song When job opportunities appear hopeless, many people start looking elsewhere, even if it means moving far away from the hometown.
- SINGER: The mirage of Mideast peace A tiny news item a little while back indicated that "Al-Qaida-linked militants" proudly claimed ownership of rockets they'd shot into northern Israel from southern Lebanon. Not much damage thankfully ensued, though apparently one rocket just missed a retirement home for Holocaust survivors.
- LETTERS FROM THE ISLAND: O Christmas tree -- is back again It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas. Last Christmas. Sorry about invoking back-to-back song titles, but we're using 2012's tree. Real, not artificial. Indoors. And thereby hangs a tale, along with a few ornaments …
- HAMILTON: Onion skins, councils and mayors Not since the days of Mayor Michael O'Laughlin have I been so surprised by a single package of council votes. The biggest surprise was when council unanimously got it wrong in not accepting the help of that Financial Restructuring Board for Local Governments that Mayor Paul Dyster proposed, and that should have passed muster.
- More Columns Headlines
- DELUCA: Can the dead really talk?